|
- Summary
-
Top Tips
-
Explanation of topic
-
Weaknesses Identified
-
Best Practices
Summary
The demands placed on store managers to achieve success during promotions are
becoming an everyday occurrence. Juggling the following factors is all in a days
work as they strive to ensure that their in store processes are being adhered
to- staff, consumer demands, promotional space, stock holding limitations, order
processing and more besides. All of this, whilst also ensuring that exceptional
customer service is delivered consistently.
Ensuring that best practice is followed and adhered to in store around
On-Shelf Availability (OSA) during promotional events is a tough nut to crack.
But the role does not sit exclusively with the store manager. It requires the
buy in - not only of every store colleague - but at head office too, in order to
achieve the overall result as a team and to meet the shoppers ever increasing
demands/expectations in store.
In store processes can be fundamental to the ability to reduce out of stocks
outside of promotions, but when you add the additional demand pressure that
promotions bring (run down on the shelves amongst them), promotions seem only
to exaggerate the need for attention in this area.
Top Tips
- Allocate experienced store colleagues to place the orders and empower
them to minimise staff turnover and loss of category and product knowledge.
- Create a collaborative process which facilitates flexibility in DC to
store lead times. One size does not fit all
- Standardise promotional displays across all stores within the estate
- Use up to date EPOS data to analyse how the promotion is performing in
early stages, in order to make any necessary amendments sooner rather than
later
- Make promotional plans as detailed, visual and descriptive as possible
to facilitate store ops and to allow decisions at store level to be
optimised
- Provide guidance on how promotional space is to be used and what
flexibility exists around it
- Get out to store to see the issues first hand. If field sales teams are
an option – engage them, if not empower yourself to make changes.
Back to Top ^
Explanation of topic
One of the major issues cited as creating out-of-stock situations during (and
outside of) promotional periods were in store processes. Many factors influence
the way in which store management and colleagues are dedicated to the
promotional On-Shelf Availability and the extent to which they have the ability
and knowledge required to comply with the processes in their totality.
Promotional out of stocks (OOS) have a greater impact on customer loyalty,
especially if the promotion has been advertised heavily. In some categories, the
lack of product on shelf can mean the difference between the customer choosing
to continue their shop or choosing to go elsewhere. Stores need to manage the
OSA process pro-actively to guarantee all promotions are available for all
customers all of the time, and can do so by focusing on how the products get to
store.
It’s a difficult balance to strike between the ability to ensure the shelves
are fully stacked to meet the promotional demand but at the same time ensuring
that wastage (particularly on chilled and fresh produce) is limited.
The size of the store can also be a relevant factor in the ability to ensure
that OSA during promotions is maintained to the level it should be. According to
most respondents...
Lack of space in the back store can mean stores are unable to hold
significant levels of buffer stock. Coupled with this, is the fact that shelf
space is limited in its ability to hold sufficient promotional stock and as a
result require a high replenishment frequency for fast selling promotions.
The study also revealed that convenience stores were not the first priority
of retailer head office where issues are encountered with promotions – as a
result they take longer to be solved. Another important issue for these “curfew
“stores, are the road and geographical restrictions where deliveries are limited
(like no evening deliveries so if promo perform well it can be OOS for most of
the day).Emergency deliveries are not an option. Even if they were, traffic may
not permit timely replenishment of stock to meet demand.
Back to Top ^
Weaknesses Identified
Forward Buying
Manufacturers’ planning departments mentioned forward buying as one of the
key factors and biggest issues of in store process failure.
The store management may do some forward buying to take advantage of the
temporarily lower price; this may create an OOS situation. If all store managers
act similarly, it can create ripples in the initial
forecast estimations at
supplier and retailer level.
Forecasting
The study also highlighted some inconsistency between requested volumes in
orders placed daily vs. forecasted volumes. This carries with it, the risk of
causing unnecessary additional pressure on the suppliers to meet the increase
(or decrease) in demand and to manage the deviation from initial volumes and
timelines agreed and deemed achievable between supplier/retailer and head
office.
Book Stock accuracy
Retailers enabling the system to place orders automatically require an
irreproachable book stock accuracy. In data analysis carried out by one
manufacturer, book stock errors across the top three retailers accounted for, on
average 26% of out of stocks in store.
Inventory inaccuracy can be generated by many factors amongst which stolen
stock or damaged product feature, but also by process negligence. During the
ordering process, store colleagues may not follow the entire process for two
main reasons
- Lack of or limited process buy in/dedication to the carry out the
process as required
- Lack of training or suitable skill set to carry out relevant tasks
As a result, the process for finding stock out the back of store may be
neglected. This can cause a knock on effect on ordering accuracy- be it through
not visibly seeing the stock is already present and choosing to order or, on the
other extreme, over-reacting to wastage figures on very short lead time products
such as bread (order day one for day one delivery) and cutting the orders to
zero. In doing so, at the end of a day of a well performing promotion, stores
may end up OOS at a key times when demand may be at its highest (afternoon,
evening and weekends).
For products where stock is ordered by store and delivered directly (milk,
bread) it was stated that a frequent source of ordering inaccuracy is where
ordering deadlines are missed and suppliers are contacted directly to make a
manual adjustment. However, an omission by the retailer to communicate and
update the system accordingly can be a source of errors in future ordering and
generate OOS during the promotion.
System adjustments
Closer to when the promotion is due to start, the shelf fill in the system
needs to be adjusted so the system knows the quantity to deliver to keep the two
displays filled to meet demand (promotional space and shelf).
Most retailers
adjust the total shelf fill centrally but leave the stores a few days to update
it if they require a different total shelf fill (displays sizes not
standardised). The stores may update it incorrectly or forget to update it.
Hence, once the promotion kicks off, the store has only the quantity to fill the
normal fixture and not the end, and as on retailer stated -
It should not be forgotten that the rate of sale during promotions vary
dramatically. Shelves do not magically get deeper or have the ability to
suddenly hold more products, the space remains constant. Despite knowledge
of this, and of the fact that uplift in demand differs in some cases 2,3 or
even 4 fold (likely more in some categories), increased attention to
replenishment is not correlated accordingly and as such does not provide the
opportunity to maximise sales and to reduce OOS situations.
Lead times
Post ordering process, the lead time from distribution centre to store is a
contributing factor to out of stocks. For most ambient promotions, the store
ordering lead time is 48 hours, decreasing the stores ability to react and
respond to frequent unexpected fluctuations of the promotion sales. Hence, if a
promotion over performs on day 1, the store may experience one full days OOS
whilst stock is deployed. As a consequence the ends remain empty and the lost
sales result. This can sometimes be further complicated by the strict
rules/guidelines around stock holding targets, not only at store level but at
retailer DC too.
Coupled with a current trend to push suppliers to deliver with shorter lead
times, it can be a challenge between having a flexible supply chain that can
react quickly and efficiently to promotional demand in store and at the same
time ensure that inbound supplier to DC service levels do not decline causing
OOS at key stages in the promotion.
It is no longer sufficient to assume that promotional uplift will follow
previous activity levels and order based on historic sales data. The potential
sales that could have been achieved had OOS been minimal must be factored in and
orders placed accordingly.
Whilst outside of promotional activity the use of stockless or flow through
replenishment (where
products arrive direct from the supplier to retailer DC and are cross docked to
store) allows for fast turnaround of
products - during promotion the use of stockless can cause issues unless store
processes allow for all stock to be placed out on shop floor almost instantly,
since there is no buffer or reserve stock in store.
Back to Top ^
Best Practices
Order Processing
Order processing should be carried out by experienced empowered employees.
One retailer adopted a more formal approach and invested in store colleagues’
empowerment in order to drive down turnover. By investing in the category
knowledge of their order writers an excellent knowledge of the category and the
customer behaviour towards the promotions was achieved (over some years).
When applied, it enabled the development of valuable expertise on the local
and store specifics enhancing accurate ordering and excellent promotion OSA.
This approach seemed to work well for this retailer but other retailers enabling
stores to order, experienced inefficient ordering which in turn resulted in
escalating stock holding. See area above for ordering as a weakness.
Tight controls and requirements to reduce working capital (specifically stock
holding) in retailer and supplier operations are forcing both sides to consider
carefully how much stock they hold at any one time. For retailers the need to
hold promotional stock to meet demand is difficult given the space constraints.
For manufacturers the need to minimise waste and obsoletes but still maximise
opportunity to sell whilst sourcing product from global locations generates its
own stock holding challenges.
Front end weighted promotions (i.e. those where most promotional stock is
delivered earlier to retailer DC/store than normal) have shown that by having
easy access to stock in stores in the first 4 days of promotion can allow for
the initial promotional incremental demand to be met more effectively than a
normally weighted promotion of equal stock holding throughout the 3 weeks. This
does of course depend on the type of product on promotion.
This may be something that you want to discuss with your retailer/supplier in
order to agree shared objectives and targets.
Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI)
As part of the study, the practice of checking and making suggestions around
orders placed by the retailers was discussed. In doing so, any potential
issues/errors will be picked up sooner than they might otherwise have been. Some
manufacturers operate with retailers using VMI. This is not always a feasible
option for all businesses, and would need to be agreed between supplier and
retailer based on joint objectives, but can provide the opportunity to get
closer to the targets in place around stock holding and truck fill.
Phasing of inbound stock
Additional suggestions around best practice for back room operations include
the phasing of inbound promotional stock to depot, and then its onward movement
from depot to store. When managed effectively this should facilitate the
management of space constraints that are relevant to so many stores.
By
including a flexible process that allowed for differing lead times to be
achieved depending on the product and its supplier location, also facilitated
the flow of goods through back rooms. For example, if standard lead time from DC
to store is 48hours for all products, there is limited flexibility available to
deal with fluctuations in demand caused by promotional activity. However,
allowing for the 48 hrs to be flexible and not generic could provide better
opportunity to get stock to store quicker and as a result onto the shelf sooner
than would have been if “one size fits all” approach had been taken.
All retailers adopted cross-docking combined with pick-by-line of most
chilled lines but also some ambient fast moving lines (crisps, soft drinks...).
Some retailers collaborate with manufacturers to develop promotion merchandising
units on wheels (dollies) for example. Retailers could set up a process where if
the stores are flagging OOS, the delivery LT from DC to stores could be reduced
to 1 day.
Some retailers have already this process in place but if next day, the
store does not receive this emergency order and place same order again, double
quantity. These practices enable them to reduce the store ordering (24 hours
instead of 2-3 days) and store replenishment lead times. Thus enabling improved
reactivity to sales fluctuations and as a result reducing the duration of stock
being OOS on shelf.
Decisions around Promotional activity
Some retailers follow a less centralised approach than others vis-à-vis how
the promotions are set up in stores. In order to limit stores making physical or
system changes that would potentially result in OOS situations, these retailers
issue to all stores rules and standards on what stores are allowed to do with
promotional space without compromising promotion OSA. Allow stores some
flexibility but not at the expense of OSA.
 |
 |
|
|
Planograms should clearly
show promotions |
|
|
|
By involving different areas of your business (i.e. Marketing), store
Planograms can be more detailed and visually descriptive of how the layout in
store for promotional activity should be. In the past retailers’ planograms
showed only the list of products going onto gondola end illustrated by one end
type if at all. After the improvements of marketing, most if not all retailers’
planogram show all the ends and their different display unit types (different
store size will use different end sizes: single, double pallet, side stack, high
shelving etc). Marketing and merchandising work together to design the new
planogram with pictures in 3D software, with the objective to make it more store
friendly. If this is not something that you are already doing you may want to
consider how this could be applied to your business and what the process would
be to get it operational.
Some stores demonstrated a positive best practice that involved securing
printed copies of the Planograms to the corresponding relevant ends prior to
promotion. Most stores receive only one or maximum two “proper” planograms. If
they are lost, stores are left with no indication of physical set up. One idea
that the researcher suggested was a form of reference database. Available at
store level (to overcome the variance in store size and plans that may not be
relevant) the document would detail the planogram relevant to each of the ends
and the action expected and would be available for all colleagues to print
quickly and easily.
Field sales agents
All manufacturers are conscious of the principal supply chain weakness that
the last 50 yards represents. Some of the larger manufacturers indicated how the
use of in store field sales agents can be beneficial in this area. Using
territory managers to check promotional set up in store, the OOS that may have
been generated and the potential interpretation for their being, can provide
valuable insight into how to avoid the same issue on a re-occurring basis. The
frequency and indeed the number of stores that are called upon can and should be
determined and reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that the focus in the store
remains on the area with biggest potential for improvement.
With issues being highlighted in store, collaboration with store managers and
store colleagues can provide opportunity there and then to fix an issue on that
product and see an immediate impact. Said field teams identified many causes,
but by far the most recurrent ones were registered as being: promotion stock in
the back room not replenished and incorrect ordering because of book stock
inaccuracy. Whilst a field sales agency operation may not be option for every
size business, the benefit of frequent visits to store by any member of your
teams should not be under-estimated.
The standardisation of all the promotional display units across all stores
would improve promotion space allocations. Sometimes, stores allocate high
selling promotions in normal fixture because of insufficient space in ends so
the replenishment frequency of these promotions is too high to ensure
uninterrupted OSA.
Back to Top ^
Other Focus Areas:
|

|

|
|

|

|

|

|
|
Forecasting |
Promotions Process |
On the Shop Floor |
Distribution |
Communication & Collaboration |
I.T |
Production |
 |
|
 |
|
Promotional On-Shelf Availability - Next steps:
|
|
 |
|
 | |
|