|
All trading relationships have their ups and downs. The fear of many companies is that recession could be increasingly damaging to relationships as price negotiations grow ever more antagonistic.
Every year IGD undertakes a detailed survey to assess the evolution of trading relationships. Through this we can test the impact of recession and from our latest assessment, drawing from 150 retailers and manufacturers, we were pleased to reach the opposite conclusion. Despite – or perhaps because of – the tough negotiations, more than two thirds (68%) of manufacturers told us that developing strategic relationships had become more important to them this year. Only 3% say that it’s less important.
Retailer versus manufacturer priorities

Source: IGD Customer Engagement Survey 2009
However, it takes two to tango and if manufacturers want to realise their aspirations they must recognise and respond to retailer views on what would enhance relationships. Our survey delivers a crystal clear message. There’s broad agreement over the need for strategic alignment and on the importance of everyday operational issues like service levels and promotion management. Two anomalies leap off the page, though: retailers would very much like their suppliers to give more attention to both shopper trends and retail economics.
From their perspective, they seek greater empathy. Manufacturers would no doubt welcome more empathy from retailers too, but in a world where ‘the customer is king’ suppliers have a particularly big incentive to build relationships. So what’s holding them back?
One explanation is that in the recent past, retail economics and shopper behaviour were relatively stable. There was little demand from retailers for help in these areas. However, with so much changing and at such a pace, new analysis and dialogue is essential.
For example, weaving together a variety of promotions to profitable effect is a complex task – especially as shopper motivations present such a moving target. It is easy to get the calculations badly wrong and suppliers that can help their retail customers hit profit targets in these difficult times will be greatly appreciated.
A second theory is that retail economics, and to a lesser extent shoppers, are seen as the domain of retailers. Traditionally suppliers have brought different and complementary insights to the table and used frameworks like category management to pool knowledge. However, the more relevant information they can digest in advance and use to stimulate ideas and options, the more influence they will hold – especially when the customer is inviting it.
A final possible explanation is the divide between sales and marketing. Traditionally, marketing departments have held the big research budget and focused on point of consumption rather than purchase. Only more recently has the emphasis started to shift, and so companies are on a learning curve.
The expense of shopper research is an inhibitor but it’s the big strategic insights that matter most in building rapport, and these needn’t be overly expensive to find. The problem is well recognised. A third of manufacturers considered their limited ability to understand retail economics and KPIs as a key challenge and four in ten said the same for shopper trends.
We’re aware that some companies have embarked on a concerted campaign to address the gaps to enhance their retail relationships. During such a period of uncertainty, with so much at stake, it would be risky to get left behind. Of course, IGD’s retailer and shopper analysts are always happy to help.
Whether it is identifying weaknesses in customer engagement plans, improving category action planning, understanding shopper trends or developing unique shopper insight - we bring best practice solutions to your business to enable you to grow your sales and profits.
More information:
|